Integrity Suite

Built on the standards

The standards are meant to be used.

These are the things built on the standards: browser tools that put the discipline to work directly, and the MCP servers that make the standards callable inside any AI assistant. Each one is described here and linked out to where it lives, the same way the site hands off to the grants work.

The tools

Precision, put to work in the browser.

Callable in an AI

The standards, inside any assistant.

Three MCP servers make the standards callable tools rather than documents to read, so an AI assistant can run them directly on the work in front of it.

CSIS and Frame Language

The server →

Two servers: structural access to the ten CSIS standards, and the Frame Language precision discipline, the watchlist, the admissibility cases, and a text auditor for own-voice writing.

CROSS and WALKRI

The server →

The grants standards as callable tools: a typed core library and an MCP server that put CROSS's obligation gates and WALKRI's field discipline inside any MCP-compatible assistant.

In outside use

Adopted beyond our own tools.

The clearest sign a standard does real work is a project that was not built to showcase it reaching for it anyway.

The Regen Web3 Toolkit

The repository →

An open coordination toolkit from the Regen and Greenpill community that adopts these standards as its structural-integrity and review lens. Its documentation credits CSIS as an external standard developed by Durgadas and treats it as the toolkit’s structural-integrity framework; the framework enforces a CRAFT non-self-adjudication rule in its code, runs a CSIS review lens at its contribution gate, and models the standards as first-class objects in its knowledge base. The toolkit scopes this plainly as informed by the standards, not conforming to them.

Where it credits the standards →